March Madness remains an exciting time for die-hard college basketball fans and casual observers alike, who eagerly create brackets and engage in friendly debates over which team will emerge victorious. However, the landscape of college basketball has undoubtedly changed in recent years, and for many, the quality of the product on display is not what it once was.
Several factors have contributed to this college basketball landscape shift, including the rise of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights, the Transfer Portal, the extra year of eligibility granted to athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic, and alternative pathways for talented players to reach the NBA. As a result, college basketball is not the product it once was. Can we remain optimistic? Are other leagues poised to capitalize on these changes? What does college basketball need to do to positively impact the landscape? We address these questions and more in the following discussion.
The Impact of Name, Image, and Likeness on the College Basketball Landscape
NIL: Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights have become a hot topic in college sports, as athletes are now allowed to monetize their personal brand by signing endorsement deals and engaging in various commercial activities. This development has led to significant changes in college basketball.
The introduction of the NIL bill has sparked a debate over the future of college athletics. While some argue that allowing college athletes to profit from their Name, Image, and Likeness could negatively impact the amateur nature of the sport, others contend that it’s a necessary step to address the exploitation of college athletes by the NCAA. As players and those around them focus on maximizing their NIL potential, it can lead to athletes choosing colleges that may not be the best basketball fit for them but offer the most lucrative monetary opportunities. This shift in priorities has the potential to change the dynamics of college basketball recruitment, as institutions and athletes weigh monetary gains against athletic development.
Furthermore, there could be concerns about team unity when one player earns significantly more from their NIL deals than their teammates. This disparity might create tension within the team and impact their performance on the court. However, proponents of NIL argue that it’s about time players have the opportunity to monetize their talents, as they have been taken advantage of for far too long. In fact, coaches have been capitalizing on their status with shoe deals and endorsement contracts, and they have the freedom to switch jobs whenever they please. It seems only fair that athletes should have the same opportunities to earn money from their hard work and dedication to the sport.
On the positive side, the implementation of NIL rights has the potential to alleviate financial pressure on student-athletes, allowing them to focus more on their education and athletic performance without worrying about making ends meet. This change could contribute to a more balanced college experience for athletes, who have historically been expected to juggle the demands of their sport with the rigors of academia, often without adequate compensation for their efforts.
The long-term effects of NIL on college basketball are unknown at this time. As the landscape of the sport continues to evolve, it will be crucial for all stakeholders to strike a balance between the financial interests of the athletes and the integrity of the game.
Transfer Portal: The Transfer Portal is a database that allows college athletes to express their intent to transfer to another school, making it easier for them to switch programs without sitting out for a year. This system has had a considerable impact on the dynamics of college basketball teams.
The Transfer Portal has been a game-changer for college basketball. On the one hand, it has provided players in unfavorable situations with the opportunity to improve their circumstances by switching to a more suitable college program without having to sit out for a year. This has led to increased competitiveness and a more level playing field, as talent becomes more evenly distributed across different schools.
However, the Transfer Portal has also caused players to leave their teams for seemingly minor reasons or without a clear plan, leading to roster instability and hindering the process of building a cohesive team. Some athletes have struggled to find a new school or have ended up playing in lower-level basketball programs, with the Transfer Portal not always living up to its promise of better opportunities.
Extra Year of Eligibility and COVID-19 Pandemic
COVID Eligibility: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted college sports, leading to the decision to grant an extra year of eligibility to all college athletes. This decision has had lasting effects on college basketball, particularly in terms of roster composition and opportunities for incoming recruits.
While this decision was made to accommodate the unique challenges posed by the pandemic, it has led to unforeseen consequences for the sport. The extra year of eligibility has resulted in fewer available spots for incoming recruits, as older players remain on college rosters. This has made it more difficult for high school athletes to secure a place in a college basketball program. Additionally, the presence of older players, some as old as 26, has altered the typical age range in college basketball, which was traditionally between 18 and 21 years old.
The combination of the Transfer Portal and the extra year of eligibility has also contributed to increased roster turnover, making it more challenging for coaches to build a cohesive and consistent team. This lack of continuity can negatively impact team chemistry and hinder the development of a winning culture.
Alternative Pathways to the NBA
Alternative Pathways: In recent years, alternative pathways to the NBA have gained prominence, as young athletes explore options beyond the traditional college route. The G League, Overtime Elite, and international leagues are a few examples of these alternatives, which have contributed to the changing landscape of college basketball.
As college basketball’s appeal wanes, talented young players are exploring alternative pathways to reach the NBA. Three primary options have emerged as popular choices for athletes looking to bypass the traditional college route: The G League, Overtime Elite, and international leagues.
The G League: The NBA’s developmental league has become an increasingly attractive option for top prospects. Players can join G League programs such as the Ignite team, which allows them to develop their skills in a professional environment, receive a salary, and maintain their draft eligibility. Scoot Henderson is one example of a player who chose this route.
Overtime Elite: Overtime Elite is a new basketball league that offers high school-age players an alternative to college basketball. Participants can earn a salary while receiving top-level coaching and training, as well as educational support. The Thompson twins, Amen and Ausar, are among the young talents who have chosen this path.
International Leagues: Playing professionally overseas has become another viable option for young players looking to hone their skills and attract the attention of NBA scouts. Leagues in countries such as Australia and France have been particularly popular, with notable examples being LaMelo Ball’s stint in Australia and Victor Wembanyama’s time in France.
These alternative pathways provide young athletes with more choices and opportunities to achieve their dreams of playing in the NBA. However, their growing popularity has also contributed to the decline in the level of talent showcased in college basketball, leaving fans longing for the days when the sport was a breeding ground for future NBA stars.
Yet, as the talent pool spreads thin and the best young basketball players increasingly opt for alternative pathways to the NBA, college basketball has lost some of its appeal to the broader audience. The sport no longer boasts the same level of talent as it did in the past when legends like Michael Jordan, Akeem Olajuwon, Ralph Sampson, Christian Laettner, Chris Paul, and Anthony Davis graced the college courts. Now, many top prospects, such as Victor Wembanyama, Scoot Henderson, Amen Thompson, and Ausar Thompson, are choosing to bypass college basketball altogether. With the possibility of the NBA allowing high school players to enter the draft in the future, today’s college stars like Brandon Miller, Cameron Whitmore, Nick Smith, and Jarace Walker may never have become collegiate athletes.
The College Basketball Product
While the college basketball games themselves can still be exciting, many fans and media members feel that the overall quality of college basketball has suffered. Anecdotal evidence suggests that interest in the sport has waned, with fans expressing disappointment on social media platforms like Twitter. College basketball’s loss of the best young talent has transformed the sport into something that primarily appeals to basketball junkies rather than a wider fan base.
In conclusion, college basketball has undergone significant changes due to the rise of NIL rights, the Transfer Portal, the extra year of eligibility granted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the emergence of alternative pathways to the NBA. These factors have resulted in a more dispersed talent pool and the loss of top young talent, altering the face of college basketball and diminishing its appeal to a broader audience.
While March Madness continues to captivate die-hard fans with its upsets and unpredictability, the sport’s overall quality has suffered from these changes. NIL rights have sparked debates over the future of college athletics, with concerns about team unity and athletes’ priorities. The Transfer Portal has both increased competitiveness and led to roster instability. The extra year of eligibility has affected opportunities for incoming recruits and the age range of college basketball players. Finally, alternative pathways to the NBA have provided young athletes with more choices, but have also contributed to the decline in talent showcased in college basketball.
As college basketball enters a new era, it remains to be seen whether it can recapture its former glory and appeal to a wider fan base. The leaders of college basketball must find a balance between the financial interests of the athletes, the integrity of the game, and the desire to maintain a high level of competitiveness to ensure the sport’s continued success.
If nothing else, the evolving landscape of college basketball and the rise of streaming opportunities provide us all with the ability to watch the basketball stars of tomorrow, no matter where they play. Take Victor Wembanyama, for example. While Wembanyama won’t be cutting down any Final Four nets in April, he will be showcasing his remarkable skills and impressive length on platforms like the NBA App or YouTube for all to see. In the end, change is inevitable, and sometimes it creates new and exciting possibilities. Just look at the emergence of ChatGPT-4! Who saw that coming? Embracing these changes can lead to a brighter future for the sport and its fans.
More college basketball landscape content:
College Basketball Needs to Change with Fran Fraschilla | John Wooden Stories with Steve Lavin
Looking to create your own content? We want to help! Contact us here.